Rights are bestowed upon men by God. Rights are also timeless, and
transcend culture and technology. There is no such thing as a right that is not
God-given. The God-given rights include life (which can only be given by God)
and freedom to choose (as first exercised with dubious skill by Adam and Eve).
Healthcare is not a right. Healthcare is a service commodity that is either
sold or donated from one person (a doctor) to another person (a patient). The
patient does not have the RIGHT to the doctor’s time, skill, knowledge or
expertise. To say that a patient has a RIGHT to those things is to dehumanize
and subjugate the doctor to the patient by force of law. Christ does not call
us to forcefully subjugate one another. He calls us to subjugate ourselves –
which is an entirely different matter, and is ultimately an exercise of our
God-given right to free choice.
If we do not make this distinction, aren’t we
operating in the same mindset and worldview that justifies abortion? Isn’t
abortion the forced subjugation of one person (the baby) to another person or
persons (the mother, father, etc.) in the name of false “rights”, namely the
“right” to not be inconvenienced? The hallmark of Marxism is the reduction of
human beings to units of economic value, and declaring doctors to be slaves to
another person’s “rights” is precisely that. History shows us that once this mindset
is adopted, there is no end. Up next will be the forced subjugation of those
who produce food – because if healthcare is a “right”, then surely food is a
“right” as well. Next up will be those who produce clothing, followed closely by
those who build homes, followed by those who build cars, followed by those who
produce energy. Where this process ends is totalitarian statism wherein every
person is a slave to the state, and thus an object – not a subject.
One more logical point. I said earlier that
rights, by definition, transcend culture and technology. If healthcare is
indeed a right, then it must follow that a pre-Columbian resident of the Amazon
River Basin was deprived of his fundamental human rights because he did not
have access to modern healthcare. That is, of course, ridiculous. I find that
if one uses this cultural-technological transcendency criterion as a litmus
test, it helps bring into clear focus what is and what is not a right. - Ann Barnhardt
No comments:
Post a Comment